<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>techfocus.org</title>
	<atom:link href="http://techfocus.org/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://techfocus.org</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2011 18:13:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Gee, I wonder why Apple&#8217;s making so much money</title>
		<link>http://techfocus.org/2011/08/16/gee-i-wonder-why-apples-making-so-much-money/</link>
		<comments>http://techfocus.org/2011/08/16/gee-i-wonder-why-apples-making-so-much-money/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2011 18:13:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>DC</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techfocus.org/?p=58</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Interesting observation over at the Register on Apple&#8217;s offer to sell you a USB drive with the Lion installer files &#8211; whereas the download is $29, the USB drive is $69. A markup of $40. A 4gb drive (which is what this looks to be) runs about $8-10. Wow. And people treat this company like [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://techfocus.org/2011/08/16/gee-i-wonder-why-apples-making-so-much-money/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Can Mozilla screw up Firefox more?</title>
		<link>http://techfocus.org/2011/08/15/can-mozilla-screw-up-firefox-more/</link>
		<comments>http://techfocus.org/2011/08/15/can-mozilla-screw-up-firefox-more/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Aug 2011 18:21:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>DC</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chrome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wtf]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techfocus.org/?p=56</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s a commonly-held UI principle that if you want to determine the version number of an app, you could go the Help menu, and then click on &#8220;About&#8221;. This is useful information for techs that may be trying to troubleshoot a problem, and it is easy to guide a person to it over the phone. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://techfocus.org/2011/08/15/can-mozilla-screw-up-firefox-more/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Give more than a little, get a little.</title>
		<link>http://techfocus.org/2011/08/15/give-more-than-a-little-get-a-little/</link>
		<comments>http://techfocus.org/2011/08/15/give-more-than-a-little-get-a-little/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Aug 2011 17:53:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>DC</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[waste]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techfocus.org/?p=53</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So if you&#8217;ve bought one of three different processors from Intel you can upgrade it. Sounds good, right? Don&#8217;t get too excited &#8211; because rather than demonstrate that they&#8217;re willing to throw a bone to regular customers, they&#8217;re going to charge you to upgrade it &#8211; and all at a price/performance ratio that is pretty [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://techfocus.org/2011/08/15/give-more-than-a-little-get-a-little/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sony just can&#8217;t catch a break</title>
		<link>http://techfocus.org/2011/08/10/sony-just-cant-catch-a-break/</link>
		<comments>http://techfocus.org/2011/08/10/sony-just-cant-catch-a-break/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2011 00:08:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>DC</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[riots]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sony]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techfocus.org/?p=49</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Things just aren&#8217;t going right for Sony.  I&#8217;d feel sorry for them, but I&#8217;m still pissed about the rootkit.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://techfocus.org/2011/08/10/sony-just-cant-catch-a-break/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Verizon knows best when it comes to tethering&#8230; but is it their right?</title>
		<link>http://techfocus.org/2011/08/09/verizon-knows-best-when-it-comes-to-tethering-but-is-it-their-right/</link>
		<comments>http://techfocus.org/2011/08/09/verizon-knows-best-when-it-comes-to-tethering-but-is-it-their-right/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Aug 2011 18:13:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>DC</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tethering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Verizon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techfocus.org/?p=45</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Because Verizon has the right to be the gatekeeper for a piece of hardware that you&#8217;ve purchased, you now cannot tether through means other than using Verizon&#8217;s approved route. I don&#8217;t believe that any company has the right to dictate what you do with a device after you&#8217;ve purchased it, unless you&#8217;ve provided express consent. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://techfocus.org/2011/08/09/verizon-knows-best-when-it-comes-to-tethering-but-is-it-their-right/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cry me a river</title>
		<link>http://techfocus.org/2011/08/09/cry-me-a-river/</link>
		<comments>http://techfocus.org/2011/08/09/cry-me-a-river/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Aug 2011 18:04:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>DC</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[haditcoming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tech]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techfocus.org/?p=41</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[China&#8217;s bitching about being attacked 500,000 times over the internet, with people targeting their infrastructure. My only question is this:  why only 500,000 times?  And how do you define a cyberattack?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://techfocus.org/2011/08/09/cry-me-a-river/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>No room to criticize, China&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://techfocus.org/2011/08/05/no-room-to-criticize-china/</link>
		<comments>http://techfocus.org/2011/08/05/no-room-to-criticize-china/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2011 19:40:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>DC</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Renminbi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trade deficit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techfocus.org/?p=38</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Beijing&#8217;s latest comments rounded on Thursday&#8217;s 500-point drop in the Dow Jones industrial index, noting that it had exposed &#8220;the plight of western economies and their deep structural defects.&#8221; You know what, China?  You print money just like we do, but you bullshit when it comes to your inflation rate, and you treat your citizens [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://techfocus.org/2011/08/05/no-room-to-criticize-china/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The moral high ground is gone, at a minimum</title>
		<link>http://techfocus.org/2011/08/05/the-moral-high-ground-is-gone-at-a-minimum/</link>
		<comments>http://techfocus.org/2011/08/05/the-moral-high-ground-is-gone-at-a-minimum/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2011 18:11:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>DC</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terrorism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drug cartels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[terrorism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techfocus.org/?p=36</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Let&#8217;s see&#8230; so we let guns go into Mexico via &#8220;Fast and Furious&#8221;, and now we&#8217;re letting drugs into the country while we cut deals with drug cartels? Yeah, this is an administration that offers hope and change.  Riiiiiight. More like an administration that works with domestic terrorists and drug dealers.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://techfocus.org/2011/08/05/the-moral-high-ground-is-gone-at-a-minimum/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>White House:  &#8220;We Don&#8217;t Create Jobs&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://techfocus.org/2011/08/05/white-house-we-dont-create-jobs/</link>
		<comments>http://techfocus.org/2011/08/05/white-house-we-dont-create-jobs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2011 18:02:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>DC</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stimulus]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techfocus.org/?p=33</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Finally the White House admits the truth &#8211; they *don&#8217;t* create jobs. But what about the $278,000 cost they&#8217;ve racked up per job via the stimulus? Hey, at least they&#8217;re jobs.  Right?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://techfocus.org/2011/08/05/white-house-we-dont-create-jobs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The name is Bonds, Safe Bonds.</title>
		<link>http://techfocus.org/2011/08/05/screw-this-my-new-best-friend-is-mr-bond/</link>
		<comments>http://techfocus.org/2011/08/05/screw-this-my-new-best-friend-is-mr-bond/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2011 17:22:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>DC</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bonds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DJIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FFS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[treasuries]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techfocus.org/?p=29</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There&#8217;s no reason at the moment to risk money to the whims of some ADD-addled traders, so why not head to bonds?  Sure, you&#8217;re not going to make money to speak of &#8211; but you&#8217;re not going to get buried either.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://techfocus.org/2011/08/05/screw-this-my-new-best-friend-is-mr-bond/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

